Agentic AI models: five built to run a task from start to finish

Agentic workflows
Services found: 5
#AI modelCapabilitiesAPI $/1M (in / out)Context windowPrice / moOutput $/1MOverviewVisit site
1

Muse Spark 1.2

Meta
Text & chatVisionAudio
$1.25 / $4.251.05M tokensAPI only4.25View
2

Muse Spark 1.1

Meta
Text & chatVisionAudio
$1.25 / $4.251.05M tokensAPI only4.25View
3

Grok Build 0.1

xAI
Text & chatAdjustable thinkingWeb search grounding
$1 / $2256K tokensAPI only2View
4

Muse Spark 1.3

Meta
Text & chatVisionAudio
$1.25 / $4.251.05M tokensAPI only4.25View
5

Muse Glimmer 30B

Meta
Text & chatVisionAgentic workflows
$0.3 / $1.1131.1K tokensAPI only1.1View

Browse by need

Five models are built explicitly for autonomous multi-step work: planning a task, calling tools in sequence, noticing when a step failed and recovering without a human in the loop. Muse Spark 1.2 and 1.1 sit here alongside Grok Build 0.1, with output from $1.10 to $4.25 per million tokens.

Agentic runs have their own cost profile. A single request can expand into dozens of model calls, and errors compound - a wrong turn at step three wastes everything after it. Reliability is worth more than headline price, and prompt caching and adjustable thinking are unusually valuable here. Budget by task completed rather than by token, and cap iterations.

Calls multiplyOne request becomes dozens of model calls and tool invocations.
Errors compoundA wrong turn early wastes everything that follows.
Caching pays doubleThe repeated system context is resent on every step of every run.

Models with this capability

The 5 models below all support this capability. Prices are input and output per 1M tokens from the vendor official price list; for dirhams multiply by 3.6725. Tap a card to open the model page.

How to choose

  • Cap iterations and wall-clock time before anything reaches production.
  • Log every step; debugging an agent without a trace is guesswork.
  • Use adjustable thinking to stop over-deliberation on simple steps.
  • Budget per completed task, since token counts vary wildly per run.

Common mistakes

No iteration limitThe classic way to discover an agent loop is the invoice.
Optimising for token priceReliability saves more than a cheaper model costs.

Who this suits

Automation teamsMulti-step workflows that used to need a human handoff.
Research toolingGathering and synthesising across many sources.
DevOpsDiagnostics that branch based on what the previous step found.

Frequently asked questions

Why is reliability worth more than price here?

One request expands into dozens of calls, and a wrong turn at step three wastes everything after it.

How should I budget?

By task completed rather than by token, and always cap iterations.

What helps most on cost?

Prompt caching for the repeated system context, and adjustable thinking to stop over-deliberation.

How many steps is realistic?

Dozens reliably on frontier models; hundreds still needs careful supervision.

Do agents need the best model?

For planning yes; individual steps often run fine on a cheap one.

Frequently searched

Ratings 0

Avg. score 0

Rate this page

Help us improve