AI models with tool calling: 166 that can call your functions

Tool calling
Services found: 166
#AI modelCapabilitiesAPI $/1M (in / out)Context windowPrice / moOutput $/1MOverviewVisit site
1

Claude Fable 5.1

Anthropic
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$10 / $501M tokensAPI only50View
2

GPT-6 Astra

OpenAI
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$10 / $501.05M tokensAPI only50View
3

GPT-6.1 Sol

OpenAI
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$2 / $101.05M tokensAPI only10View
4

GPT-6 Sol

OpenAI
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$2 / $101.05M tokensAPI only10View
5

GPT-6 Luna

OpenAI
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$0.1 / $0.51.05M tokensAPI only0.5View
6

Claude Opus 5.5

Anthropic
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$4 / $201M tokensAPI only20View
7

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Anthropic
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$2 / $101M tokensAPI only10View
8

Grok 4.7

xAI
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$2 / $6500K tokensAPI only6View
9

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

DeepSeek
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$0.3 / $1.21M tokensAPI only1.2View
10

GLM 5.3 FlashX

Z.ai
Text & chatVisionVideo
$0.37 / $1.251M tokensAPI only1.25View
11

Ember-1

Fireworks AI
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$3 / $151.04M tokensAPI only15View
12

Claude Opus 5

Anthropic
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$5 / $251M tokensAPI only25View
13

Claude Fable 5

Anthropic
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$10 / $501M tokensAPI only50View
14

GPT-5.6 Sol

OpenAI
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$4 / $201.05M tokensAPI only20View
15

GLM 5.3

Z.ai
Text & chatReasoningTool calling
$1.4 / $4.41.31M tokensAPI only4.4View
16

Grok 4.6

xAI
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$2 / $6500K tokensAPI only6View
17

Kimi K3

Moonshot AI
Text & chatVisionVideo
$3 / $151.05M tokensAPI only15View
18

GPT-5.6 Terra

OpenAI
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$2 / $121.05M tokensAPI only12View
19

Claude Opus 4.8

Anthropic
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$5 / $251M tokensAPI only25View
20

GLM 5.3 Flash

Z.ai
Text & chatVisionVideo
$0.075 / $0.251.31M tokensAPI only0.25View

Browse by need

Tool calling is what turns a chatbot into software. The model returns a structured call - function name plus typed arguments - and your code executes it, feeds back the result and lets the model continue. Every integration worth building rests on it.

All 166 models here support it, from Claude Fable 5.1 at $50 per million output tokens down to budget options at $0.25. What varies is reliability under pressure: how well the model picks the right tool from a long list, and how many calls it can chain before losing the thread. Frontier models are noticeably better at long chains.

Structured, not guessedThe model returns a typed call, so your code never parses prose to decide what to run.
Chains break at scaleReliability drops as the tool catalogue grows; frontier models hold longer chains together.
Pairs with JSON outputTool calling picks the action, structured output guarantees the shape of the final answer.

Models with this capability

How to choose

  • Keep tool descriptions short and unambiguous — most failures are description problems, not model problems.
  • Limit the catalogue per request; twenty tools is manageable, two hundred is not.
  • Handle partial failure explicitly: models recover better when the error message says what to do next.
  • Cache the tool definitions — they are the same on every call and caching cuts that input cost.

Common mistakes

One giant toolSplitting into several narrow tools raises accuracy far more than prompt tuning.
No timeout on chainsWithout an iteration cap an agentic loop can call tools until the budget is gone.

Who this suits

Integration teamsConnecting an assistant to internal APIs, CRMs and databases.
AutomationWorkflows where the model decides the next step rather than following a script.
Support productsLooking up orders, issuing refunds, checking availability inside the conversation.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference from structured output?

Tool calling decides which function to run and with what arguments. Structured output constrains the shape of the final answer. Most production systems use both.

Do cheap models call tools reliably?

For a handful of well-described tools, yes. Accuracy drops as the catalogue grows and as chains get longer, which is where frontier models pull ahead.

Can the model run the tool itself?

Not by default — your code executes the call. For models that run code in a vendor sandbox, see code execution.

Can the model call several tools at once?

Most current models support parallel calls, which cuts latency on independent lookups.

What happens if the model invents a tool?

A well-formed implementation rejects unknown names and returns an error the model can act on.

Frequently searched

Ratings 0

Avg. score 0

Rate this page

Help us improve