Microsoft Phi-4 models: small enough to run on the device

Microsoft
Services found: 3
#AI modelCapabilitiesAPI $/1M (in / out)Context windowPrice / moOutput $/1MOverviewVisit site
1

Phi-4 Mini Instruct

Microsoft
Text & chatReasoningTool calling
$0.075 / $0.30131.1K tokensAPI only0.3View
2

Phi-4 Reasoning

Microsoft
Text & chatReasoningTool calling
32.8K tokensAPI onlyView
3

Phi-4 Mini Reasoning

Microsoft
Text & chatReasoningTool calling
128K tokensAPI onlyView

Browse by need

Microsoft contribution here is the Phi family: compact models tuned to punch above their parameter count. They are open weight and small enough for edge and on-device deployment, which is the point of them.

Phi is not competing with frontier models on hard reasoning. It exists for cases where latency, privacy or hardware constraints rule out a hosted call — classification on device, offline assistants, embedded features.

Small by designBuilt for edge and on-device rather than datacentre inference.
Open weightsDownloadable and permissively licensed.
Not a flagshipCompact models for constrained environments, not hard reasoning.

Models from this vendor

3 Microsoft models in this rating. Prices are input and output per 1M tokens from the vendor official price list; for dirhams multiply by 3.6725. Tap a card to open the model page.

How to choose

  • Benchmark against a comparable model from a larger vendor before committing production traffic — line-ups this size get less independent testing.
  • Check the context window against your longest input — the largest here is Phi-4 Mini Instruct at 131.1K tokens.
  • Request current rates directly: 3 of the listed models publish no public per-token price.
  • Confirm support terms and deprecation policy, which smaller vendors document less thoroughly.

Common mistakes

Reading an empty price as free3 models here publish no public rate. Empty means unconfirmed.
Skipping the exit planA smaller vendor can change terms or availability faster. Identify a fallback model before you depend on this one.

Who this suits

Cost-driven teamsPricing sits below the mainstream vendors where published.
EvaluatorsA useful comparison point when benchmarking the models against larger line-ups.
Regional usersRelevant where this vendor platform or language coverage matters more than raw capability.

Related filters

Text & chat228 models for text generation and chat
Reasoning169 models that think before answering
Tool calling166 models that call your functions
Low latency73 small, fast models for volume
Alibaba (Qwen)34 models in this rating
OpenAI30 models in this rating
Google DeepMind17 models in this rating

Frequently asked questions

What is Phi for?

On-device and edge inference where a hosted call is impractical.

Is Phi free?

The weights are published; you supply the compute.

Does Microsoft sell a frontier model?

Not in this rating — its hosted offering resells OpenAI models through Azure.

How many Microsoft models are in this rating?

3, covering text & chat, reasoning, tool calling.

Is Microsoft a good default choice?

For most teams no — start with a mainstream vendor and use this one where its pricing or specialisation gives a concrete advantage.

Frequently searched

Ratings 0

Avg. score 0

Rate this page

Help us improve