NVIDIA Nemotron models: open weights meant for your own GPUs

NVIDIA
Services found: 6
#AI modelCapabilitiesAPI $/1M (in / out)Context windowPrice / moOutput $/1MOverviewVisit site
1

Nemotron 3 Ultra

NVIDIA
Text & chatReasoningTool calling
$0.625 / $3.125262.1K tokensAPI only3.125View
2

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

NVIDIA
Text & chatReasoningTool calling
$0.08 / $0.2262.1K tokensAPI only0.2View
3

Nemotron 3 Super

NVIDIA
Text & chatReasoningTool calling
$0.085 / $0.4262.1K tokensAPI only0.4View
4

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

NVIDIA
Text & chatReasoningTool calling
$0.05 / $0.2262.1K tokensAPI only0.2View
5

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni

NVIDIA
Text & chatVisionAudio
$0 / $0256K tokensAPI only0View
6

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

NVIDIA
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$0.2 / $0.2131.1K tokensAPI only0.2View

Browse by need

NVIDIA ships Nemotron as open-weight models designed to run efficiently on its own accelerators. The line covers general instruction following and reasoning, with hosted access available through build.nvidia.com and self-hosting as the intended destination.

The argument is vertical integration: if your inference already runs on NVIDIA hardware, a model tuned for that stack removes a layer of optimisation work. For teams on managed APIs the appeal is weaker.

Hardware-alignedTuned for the accelerators you are probably already running.
Open weightsSelf-hosting is the intended path, not a fallback.
Enterprise focusBuilt around deployment rather than consumer chat.

Models from this vendor

How to choose

  • Benchmark against a comparable model from a larger vendor before committing production traffic — line-ups this size get less independent testing.
  • Start with Nemotron 3 Nano Omni at $0 / $0 per 1M tokens; it is the cheapest entry point here.
  • Move up to Nemotron 3 Ultra at $0.625 / $3.125 only where the cheaper variant visibly fails, not by default.
  • Check the context window against your longest input — the largest here is Nemotron 3 Ultra at 262.1K tokens.

Common mistakes

Assuming parity with the majorsOn the hardest tasks the frontier labs remain ahead; compare on your own cases.
Skipping the exit planA smaller vendor can change terms or availability faster. Identify a fallback model before you depend on this one.

Who this suits

Cost-driven teamsNemotron 3 Nano Omni at $0 / $0 undercuts most mainstream options.
EvaluatorsA useful comparison point when benchmarking the models against larger line-ups.
Regional usersRelevant where this vendor platform or language coverage matters more than raw capability.

Related filters

Text & chat228 models for text generation and chat
Reasoning169 models that think before answering
Tool calling166 models that call your functions
Frontier tier41 flagship models, the best each vendor sells
Alibaba (Qwen)34 models in this rating
OpenAI30 models in this rating
Google DeepMind17 models in this rating

Frequently asked questions

Do I need NVIDIA hardware?

Not strictly, but the efficiency argument assumes it.

Are Nemotron models free?

The weights are published; you pay for compute rather than tokens.

How do they compare with Llama-class models?

Comparable on general tasks, with tuning aimed at deployment efficiency.

How many NVIDIA models are in this rating?

6, covering text & chat, reasoning, tool calling.

Is NVIDIA a good default choice?

For most teams no — start with a mainstream vendor and use this one where its pricing or specialisation gives a concrete advantage.

Frequently searched

Ratings 0

Avg. score 0

Rate this page

Help us improve