Adjustable thinking AI models: set the reasoning budget per request

Adjustable thinking
Services found: 79
#AI modelCapabilitiesAPI $/1M (in / out)Context windowPrice / moOutput $/1MOverviewVisit site
21

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Google
Text & chatVisionAudio
$0.75 / $3.751.05M tokensAPI only3.75View
22

Qwen3.8 27B

Qwen
Text & chatVisionVideo
$0.42 / $31M tokensAPI only3View
23

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423

DeepSeek
Text & chatReasoningAdjustable thinking
$0.95526 / $1.910521.05M tokensAPI only1.911View
24

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Anthropic
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$3 / $151M tokensAPI only15View
25

Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen
Text & chatReasoningAdjustable thinking
$2.5 / $7.51M tokensAPI only7.5View
26

Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$0.32 / $1.281M tokensAPI only1.28View
27

Grok 4.3

xAI
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$1.25 / $2.51M tokensAPI only2.5View
28

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423

DeepSeek
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$0.088606 / $0.1772121.05M tokensAPI only0.177View
29

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Google
Text & chatVisionAudio
$0.3 / $2.51.05M tokensAPI only2.5View
30

Qwen3.6 27B

Qwen
Text & chatVisionVideo
$0.3 / $2262.1K tokensAPI only2View
31

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Anthropic
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$3 / $151M tokensAPI only15View
32

Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Qwen
Text & chatVisionVideo
$0.55 / $3.5262.1K tokensAPI only3.5View
33

Claude Haiku 4.5

Anthropic
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$1 / $5200K tokensAPI only5View
34

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Qwen
Text & chatVisionVideo
$0.29 / $2.4262.1K tokensAPI only2.4View
35

Qwen3 Coder Next

Qwen
Text & chatCodingReasoning
$0.12 / $0.8262.1K tokensAPI only0.8View
36

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Google
Text & chatVisionAudio
$0.25 / $1.51.05M tokensAPI only1.5View
37

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe

Google
AudioAdjustable thinkingSpeech-to-text
API onlyView
38

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live

Google
AudioAdjustable thinkingSpeech-to-text
API onlyView
39

Grok 4.20 Reasoning

xAI
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$1.25 / $2.51M tokensAPI only2.5View
40

Grok 4.20 Non-Reasoning

xAI
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$1.25 / $2.51M tokensAPI only2.5View

Browse by need

Eighty-five models let you set how long the model deliberates before answering. Because thinking tokens bill as output, that dial is a direct cost control: the same model can be cheap and quick or slow and thorough depending on a single parameter.

The Claude family exposes it most clearly, and Grok, Qwen3 and DeepSeek V4 offer their own variants - DeepSeek switches between thinking and non-thinking modes outright. Set the dial per task rather than per application: minimal for classification and extraction, generous for architecture decisions and debugging.

Quality as a dialThe same model can be cheap and quick or slow and thorough on demand.
Per task, not per appExtraction wants minimal depth; architecture decisions want maximum.
Direct cost controlBecause thinking bills as output, the dial moves the invoice immediately.

Models with this capability

How to choose

  • Profile your task mix before fixing a default depth.
  • Use minimal settings for anything deterministic — parsing, routing, classification.
  • Reserve deep settings for ambiguous problems where a wrong answer is expensive.
  • Log which depth produced which outcome so the setting can be tuned with evidence.

Common mistakes

One global settingA single depth for every request overpays on easy work and underdelivers on hard work.
Turning thinking off entirelyOn genuinely hard tasks it costs more in retries than it saves in tokens.

Who this suits

Cost-sensitive productsFixed budgets with variable task difficulty.
Agent buildersCapping deliberation keeps multi-step runs from spiralling.
Mixed workloadsOne model serving both trivial and demanding requests.

Frequently asked questions

How does the dial save money?

Thinking tokens bill as output. A shallow setting on the same model can cost a fraction of a deep one.

Which models expose it?

The Claude family most clearly, plus Grok, Qwen3 and DeepSeek V4, which switches thinking off entirely.

Should it be set per app or per task?

Per task. Minimal for extraction and classification, generous for architecture decisions and debugging.

Which vendors expose the control?

Anthropic, xAI, Alibaba and DeepSeek, each with its own naming.

Is low depth the same as a smaller model?

No. A large model thinking briefly still brings its full knowledge to the answer.

Frequently searched

Ratings 0

Avg. score 0

Rate this page

Help us improve