Vision AI models: screenshots, charts and scans as input

Vision
Services found: 156
#AI modelCapabilitiesAPI $/1M (in / out)Context windowPrice / moOutput $/1MOverviewVisit site
21

Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Qwen
Text & chatVisionVideo
$2 / $61M tokensAPI only6View
22

Muse Spark 1.2

Meta
Text & chatVisionAudio
$1.25 / $4.251.05M tokensAPI only4.25View
23

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Google
Text & chatVisionAudio
$0.75 / $3.751.05M tokensAPI only3.75View
24

Grok 4.5

xAI
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$2 / $6500K tokensAPI only6View
25

GPT-5.5

OpenAI
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$5 / $301.05M tokensAPI only30View
26

Claude Sonnet 5

Anthropic
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$2 / $101M tokensAPI only10View
27

GPT-5.6 Luna

OpenAI
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$0.2 / $1.21.05M tokensAPI only1.2View
28

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

DeepSeek
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$0.065 / $0.181.31M tokensAPI only0.18View
29

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Google
Text & chatVisionAudio
$0.75 / $3.751.05M tokensAPI only3.75View
30

Muse Spark 1.1

Meta
Text & chatVisionAudio
$1.25 / $4.251.05M tokensAPI only4.25View
31

Qwen3.8 27B

Qwen
Text & chatVisionVideo
$0.42 / $31M tokensAPI only3View
32

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Anthropic
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$3 / $151M tokensAPI only15View
33

MiniMax M3

MiniMax
Text & chatVisionVideo
$0.3 / $1.21.05M tokensAPI only1.2View
34

Kimi K2.7 Code

Moonshot AI
Text & chatVisionCoding
$0.71 / $3.5262.1K tokensAPI only3.5View
35

Inkling Small

Thinkingmachines
Text & chatVisionAudio
$0.45 / $1.21.05M tokensAPI only1.2View
36

Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$0.32 / $1.281M tokensAPI only1.28View
37

Inkling

Thinkingmachines
Text & chatVisionAudio
$1.87 / $4.68²1.05M tokensAPI only4.68View
38

Grok 4.3

xAI
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$1.25 / $2.51M tokensAPI only2.5View
39

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423

DeepSeek
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$0.088606 / $0.1772121.05M tokensAPI only0.177View
40

GPT-5.4 Mini

OpenAI
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$0.75 / $4.5400K tokensAPI only4.5View

Browse by need

Vision means the model takes images as input and reasons about them - reading a chart, extracting a table from a screenshot, checking a photo against a description. It is not image generation; for that, see the Image generation filter.

156 models qualify, priced from $0.18 to $50 per million output tokens. Image input is billed in tokens too, and a high-resolution photo can consume as much as several pages of text. Claude Fable 5.1, GPT-6 Astra and Claude Opus 5 lead on dense diagrams, handwriting and multi-page scans; for simple tasks the budget tier is a tenth of the price.

Resolution drives costImage input bills in tokens scaled by size. Downscaling before upload is the cheapest optimisation.
Reading is not generatingThese models interpret images; producing them is a separate capability.
Hard cases separate tiersHandwriting, dense diagrams and multi-page scans are where frontier models earn their price.

Models with this capability

How to choose

  • Test on your worst images, not your best — scans and photos of screens are the usual failure point.
  • Check whether the model accepts multiple images per request if you process documents.
  • Compare cost per page, not per token, when the workload is document-heavy.
  • Pair with structured output if you extract fields rather than descriptions.

Common mistakes

Uploading full-resolution photosMost tasks work at a fraction of the pixels and a fraction of the price.
Trusting extracted numbersVision models misread digits under poor contrast. Verify anything financial.

Who this suits

Document processingInvoices, contracts, forms and identity documents at scale.
SupportUsers pasting screenshots instead of describing the problem.
CommerceCataloguing, moderation and attribute extraction from product photos.

Frequently asked questions

Does vision mean the model draws pictures?

No. Vision is image input. For generating images, see image generation.

How is image input billed?

In tokens, scaled by resolution. A high-resolution photo can cost as much as several pages of text, so downscaling before upload is the first optimisation.

Which model reads handwriting and dense diagrams best?

The frontier tier — Claude Fable 5.1, GPT-6 Astra, Claude Opus 5. For receipts and product photos the budget tier is indistinguishable in practice.

Can vision models read tables?

Yes, and well — but verify totals. Structure survives better than exact figures.

Do they work on video frames?

They accept stills. For continuous footage, use a video-understanding model.

Frequently searched

Ratings 1

Avg. score 5

Rate this page

Help us improve