AI models with tool calling: 166 that can call your functions

Tool calling
Services found: 166
#AI modelCapabilitiesAPI $/1M (in / out)Context windowPrice / moOutput $/1MOverviewVisit site
61

Solar Pro 3

Upstage
Text & chatReasoningTool calling
$0.15 / $0.6131.1K tokensAPI only0.6View
62

Ministral 3 14B 2512

Mistral AI
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$0.2 / $0.2262.1K tokensAPI only0.2View
63

Ministral 3 8B 2512

Mistral AI
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$0.15 / $0.15262.1K tokensAPI only0.15View
64

Ministral 3 3B 2512

Mistral AI
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$0.1 / $0.1131.1K tokensAPI only0.1View
65

GPT-5.4

OpenAI
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$2.5 / $151.05M tokensAPI only15View
66

GPT-5.3-Codex

OpenAI
Text & chatVisionCoding
$1.75 / $14400K tokensAPI only14View
67

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Google
Text & chatVisionAudio
$0.25 / $1.51.05M tokensAPI only1.5View
68

Grok 4.20 Reasoning

xAI
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$1.25 / $2.51M tokensAPI only2.5View
69

Grok 4.20 Non-Reasoning

xAI
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$1.25 / $2.51M tokensAPI only2.5View
70

DeepSeek V4 Pro

DeepSeek
Text & chatReasoningAdjustable thinking
1M tokensAPI onlyView
71

DeepSeek V4 Flash

DeepSeek
Text & chatVisionReasoning
1M tokensAPI onlyView
72

Command A+

Cohere
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$17.50–$32.50 / hr¹128K tokensAPI onlyView
73

Command A Reasoning

Cohere
Text & chatReasoningTool calling
API onlyView
74

Command A Vision

Cohere
Text & chatVisionReasoning
128K tokensAPI onlyView
75

Command A Translate

Cohere
Text & chatReasoningTranslation
API onlyView
76

Jamba2 Mini

AI21 Labs
Text & chatReasoningTool calling
256K tokensAPI onlyView
77

Jamba2 3B

AI21 Labs
Text & chatReasoningTool calling
256K tokensAPI onlyView
78

Nova Premier

Amazon
Text & chatVisionVideo
API onlyView
79

Nova Pro

Amazon
Text & chatVisionVideo
300K tokensAPI onlyView
80

Phi-4 Mini Instruct

Microsoft
Text & chatReasoningTool calling
$0.075 / $0.30131.1K tokensAPI only0.3View

Browse by need

Tool calling is what turns a chatbot into software. The model returns a structured call - function name plus typed arguments - and your code executes it, feeds back the result and lets the model continue. Every integration worth building rests on it.

All 166 models here support it, from Claude Fable 5.1 at $50 per million output tokens down to budget options at $0.25. What varies is reliability under pressure: how well the model picks the right tool from a long list, and how many calls it can chain before losing the thread. Frontier models are noticeably better at long chains.

Structured, not guessedThe model returns a typed call, so your code never parses prose to decide what to run.
Chains break at scaleReliability drops as the tool catalogue grows; frontier models hold longer chains together.
Pairs with JSON outputTool calling picks the action, structured output guarantees the shape of the final answer.

Models with this capability

How to choose

  • Keep tool descriptions short and unambiguous — most failures are description problems, not model problems.
  • Limit the catalogue per request; twenty tools is manageable, two hundred is not.
  • Handle partial failure explicitly: models recover better when the error message says what to do next.
  • Cache the tool definitions — they are the same on every call and caching cuts that input cost.

Common mistakes

One giant toolSplitting into several narrow tools raises accuracy far more than prompt tuning.
No timeout on chainsWithout an iteration cap an agentic loop can call tools until the budget is gone.

Who this suits

Integration teamsConnecting an assistant to internal APIs, CRMs and databases.
AutomationWorkflows where the model decides the next step rather than following a script.
Support productsLooking up orders, issuing refunds, checking availability inside the conversation.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference from structured output?

Tool calling decides which function to run and with what arguments. Structured output constrains the shape of the final answer. Most production systems use both.

Do cheap models call tools reliably?

For a handful of well-described tools, yes. Accuracy drops as the catalogue grows and as chains get longer, which is where frontier models pull ahead.

Can the model run the tool itself?

Not by default — your code executes the call. For models that run code in a vendor sandbox, see code execution.

Can the model call several tools at once?

Most current models support parallel calls, which cuts latency on independent lookups.

What happens if the model invents a tool?

A well-formed implementation rejects unknown names and returns an error the model can act on.

Frequently searched

Ratings 0

Avg. score 0

Rate this page

Help us improve