AI models with tool calling: 166 that can call your functions

Tool calling
Services found: 166
#AI modelCapabilitiesAPI $/1M (in / out)Context windowPrice / moOutput $/1MOverviewVisit site
81

Phi-4 Reasoning

Microsoft
Text & chatReasoningTool calling
32.8K tokensAPI onlyView
82

Phi-4 Mini Reasoning

Microsoft
Text & chatReasoningTool calling
128K tokensAPI onlyView
83

Qwen3.8 Max

Alibaba
Text & chatReasoningAdjustable thinking
$2 / $61M tokensAPI only6View
84

Qwen3 VL Plus

Alibaba
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$0.2 / $1.6256K tokensAPI only1.6View
85

Qwen3 VL Flash

Alibaba
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$0.05 / $0.4256K tokensAPI only0.4View
86

ERNIE 5.1

Baidu
Text & chatReasoningTool calling
$0.56 / $2.53API only2.53View
87

ERNIE 5.0

Baidu
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$1.4 / $5.6119K tokensAPI only5.6View
88

ERNIE 4.5 Turbo VL

Baidu
Text & chatVisionReasoning
128K tokensAPI onlyView
89

Doubao Seed Evolving

ByteDance
Text & chatReasoningTool calling
API onlyView
90

Doubao Seed 2.1 Turbo

ByteDance
Text & chatReasoningTool calling
API onlyView
91

Doubao Seed 2.0 Code

ByteDance
Text & chatVisionCoding
API onlyView
92

Doubao Seed 2.0 Lite

ByteDance
Text & chatVisionReasoning
API onlyView
93

Doubao Seed 2.0 Mini

ByteDance
Text & chatVisionReasoning
API onlyView
94

Doubao Seed Vision

ByteDance
Text & chatVisionReasoning
API onlyView
95

GLM 5.2

Z.ai
Text & chatReasoningTool calling
$0.966 / $3.0361.05M tokensAPI only3.036View
96

Solar Pro 4

Upstage
Text & chatReasoningTool calling
$0.30 / $1.20524.3K tokensAPI only1.2View
97

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro

OpenAI
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$0.2 / $1.21.05M tokensAPI only1.2View
98

Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen
Text & chatVisionVideo
$0.03 / $0.131M tokensAPI only0.13View
99

Qwen3.8 Flash

Qwen
Text & chatVisionVideo
$0.15 / $0.471M tokensAPI only0.47View
100

Kimi K2.6

Moonshot AI
Text & chatVisionReasoning
$0.95 / $4262.1K tokensAPI only4View

Browse by need

Tool calling is what turns a chatbot into software. The model returns a structured call - function name plus typed arguments - and your code executes it, feeds back the result and lets the model continue. Every integration worth building rests on it.

All 166 models here support it, from Claude Fable 5.1 at $50 per million output tokens down to budget options at $0.25. What varies is reliability under pressure: how well the model picks the right tool from a long list, and how many calls it can chain before losing the thread. Frontier models are noticeably better at long chains.

Structured, not guessedThe model returns a typed call, so your code never parses prose to decide what to run.
Chains break at scaleReliability drops as the tool catalogue grows; frontier models hold longer chains together.
Pairs with JSON outputTool calling picks the action, structured output guarantees the shape of the final answer.

Models with this capability

How to choose

  • Keep tool descriptions short and unambiguous — most failures are description problems, not model problems.
  • Limit the catalogue per request; twenty tools is manageable, two hundred is not.
  • Handle partial failure explicitly: models recover better when the error message says what to do next.
  • Cache the tool definitions — they are the same on every call and caching cuts that input cost.

Common mistakes

One giant toolSplitting into several narrow tools raises accuracy far more than prompt tuning.
No timeout on chainsWithout an iteration cap an agentic loop can call tools until the budget is gone.

Who this suits

Integration teamsConnecting an assistant to internal APIs, CRMs and databases.
AutomationWorkflows where the model decides the next step rather than following a script.
Support productsLooking up orders, issuing refunds, checking availability inside the conversation.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference from structured output?

Tool calling decides which function to run and with what arguments. Structured output constrains the shape of the final answer. Most production systems use both.

Do cheap models call tools reliably?

For a handful of well-described tools, yes. Accuracy drops as the catalogue grows and as chains get longer, which is where frontier models pull ahead.

Can the model run the tool itself?

Not by default — your code executes the call. For models that run code in a vendor sandbox, see code execution.

Can the model call several tools at once?

Most current models support parallel calls, which cuts latency on independent lookups.

What happens if the model invents a tool?

A well-formed implementation rejects unknown names and returns an error the model can act on.

Frequently searched

Ratings 0

Avg. score 0

Rate this page

Help us improve